Marc's Mortgage Matter's

September 18th, 2011 9:08 AM

The U.S. Post Office is on target to lose $10 billion this year, and maybe it’s time to really think about what it’s used for. How many letters from friends or Aunt Tillie do you really get in the mail? Isn’t 90% of it just bills, catalogs, and junk mail? We once proposed selling the post office, but now we’d propose putting the postal service out to bid. The U.S. Postal Service could bid, but they’d be going up against much better run companies such as UPS and FedEx, and maybe some foreign postal services which have already been privatized.

 

Postmen have always had a good image, but FedEx people are nice and there are jokes about women ordering stuff online just so they can have the UPS men in their cute brown shorts show up at their front door. Remember the scene in Legally Blond about the UPS man making a delivery? Bend and snap?

And while we’re at it, let’s also make the TSA bid for the job of providing airport security.

Nearly 11 million properties, roughly 22.5% of all U.S. homes, were worth less than the underlying mortgage in the second quarter, according to CoreLogic (CLGX: 12.10 +0.83%).

The percentage of properties in negative equity declined slightly from 22.7% the previous quarter and down from 24% one year ago. Another 2.4 million borrowers held less than 5% equity in their home, what analysts call near-negative equity. CoreLogic also showed nearly three-quarters of all underwater borrowers are paying above-market interest on their home loans.

"High negative equity is holding back refinancing and sales activity and is a major impediment to the housing market recovery," said Mark Fleming, CoreLogic chief economist.

More borrowers could be in danger of falling underwater. JPMorgan Chase analysts expect home prices to drop another 5% by the beginning of 2012, pushing the amount of underwater borrowers to 15 million, according to a research note released earlier in the month. If prices drop more, possibly 10% further, the number of borrowers in negative equity would approach 20 million.

The Obama administration continues working on a proposal to boost refinancings, which many include eliminating some negative equity restrictions on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans. Some analysts believe such a program would have only modest impact, but CoreLogic showed nearly 28 million outstanding mortgages hold above-market rates and, in theory, should be able to refinance.

Of these, 8 million borrowers are in negative equity.

Some believe the new plan from the administration will be a revamp of the Home Affordable Refinance Program, which allows Fannie and Freddie borrowers with up to 125% LTV to refinance.

But more than 40% of borrowers with LTVs above that limit are trapped with mortgage rates above 6%. Only 17% of borrowers with positive equity have rates at that level.

Negative equity also affects sales. Traditional home sales in areas with low negative equity numbers dropped 61% since the peak in 2005, compared with an 83% drop in areas with more underwater borrowers.

Roughly 60% if borrowers in Nevada were underwater in the second quarter, the highest percentage of any state but down from 68% one year ago. It was followed by Arizona at 49% and Florida at 45%.

"The hardest hit markets have improved over the last year, primarily as a result of foreclosures. But nationally, the level of mortgage debt remains high relative to home prices," CoreLogic said.

There’s only one way to handle being fired, and it’s to be gracious, dignified, and humble. Yahoo just fired their CEO, Carol Bartz, who immediately sent out this e-mail to her staff: “I am sad to tell you that I’ve just been fired over the phone by Yahoo’s chairman of the Board….” Saying that it was over the phone is a snide and unnecessary dig at the Chairman.

The only acceptable email should have been, “The Board has decided to replace me with a new CEO. While I am saddened at leaving such a great company, I know the Board is dedicated to growing the company so that shareholders, customers, and employees can all benefit. I fully understand that they felt we were not moving fast enough to turn things around. It has been a distinct honor to work here with so many dedicated people, and I know that the company has a bright future. My best to each and every one of you.” That’s what she should have written.

Okay, that was last Wednesday. Thursday, Ms. Bartz further destroyed her reputation when she had an interview with Fortune magazine in which she said that “The Board f----- me over”, and that she told Board Chairman Roy Bostock (about his firing her over the phone), “Why don’t you have the balls to tell me in person?” She then called the Yahoo Board “the worst Board in the country”, called the individual directors “doofusses,” and said that she refuses to give up her Board seat. All in all, this is called Career Suicide.

If you want to use some humor when you just got fired, that’s okay as long as it’s self-deprecating. One of Ronald Reagan’s first acts as Governor in 1967 was to fire Clark Kerr as President of the University of California. When the Board of Regents meeting ended and the press asked Kerr how he felt, he quipped, “I leave just as I started, fired with enthusiasm.” Even Reagan chuckled at this.

How powerful is China? American movie studios are so eager to break into the markets in China (and so afraid of offending anyone there) that MGM recently edited Chinese villains out of the remake of Red Dawn and replaced them with North Koreans.

 

Oy Vey?

 

An employee investigates and then rats out crooked colleagues at Countrywide Financial, is fired, but then the US Department of Labor orders the bank to rehire the employee and pay $1 million in penalties. No, this isn't a Julia Roberts/Abe Vigoda movie, this is all for real: JuicyScript 

It's become an all-too-familiar phrase this year: "Mortgage rates post new record lows." (Stupidest narcastic comment running for 2011...!) But aside from that favorable happenstance, what other positive can be found on which to focus in the housing market? Delinquencies, foreclosures, underwater homeowners, borrowers with sub-par credentials and more have been a continuing story for years now, and there is little abatement in those areas. Even record low mortgage rates have limits in how much assistance they can offer, as most homeowners are no where near being able to refinance altogether let alone will those "lenders" even close a loan at that low low rate.

But we may see a new push to help long-term rates even lower in the weeks and months ahead. Whether or not it will do much good remains an open question.

The Federal Reserve conducts a two-day meeting this week to discuss what can be done to stimulate an economy which clearly needs some help. While the Fed might consider a new round of bond or mortgage-backed security buying, the beneficial effects of those programs ideas are believed to largely spent. Instead, two ideas which seem likely to get the most play are changing the mix of the duration of holdings on the Fed's balance sheet (called "Operation Twist"), which would see the Fed trading in maturing short-term bills and notes in favor of purchasing more longer-term bonds, and/or lowering the interest the Fed is paying banks to park excess funds with the Fed itself.

The concepts themselves are pretty simple. Changing the investment mix means that short-term rates (already near zero, and so hard to force lower) might increase slightly as the Fed purchases fewer of them, while long term rates might decline as the Fed willingly buys these bonds, which will tend to push their prices up and their yields down. Rather than compete against the Fed, this change might push investors to seek out higher yielding "risk" assets, taking money away from the safe haven of Treasuries and putting it to work it the private economy, which in turn might provide some boost to economic activity.

At the same time, lowering the yield banks are earning by keeping money parked and out of circulation might see banks instead pushing to lend or invest in elsewhere in the economy, which might make more money available for lending, and at possibly easier the terms for certain kinds of borrowers, most probably business borrowers.

How much benefit will come from this is a matter of speculation, but there is potential for it to boost GDP growth by a couple of tenths of a percent or so. Given the weak state of the economy -- presently hovering around a 1% GDP rate -- any boost would be welcome, but any new Fed program is certainly not a panacea for what ails the economy. Perhaps there are other ideas which may come to light when the Fed meeting ends on Wednesday, and more radical ideas may certainly be considered by the Committee, but these seem most likely to come at the moment.

Soooo the economic picture remains fairly dark, and the Fed will be doing... something with perhaps some benefit, but probably nothing immediate. Arguments in Washington over how much to spend and where on attempts to boost employment will continue, but even if the release whatever funds are made available came tomorrow, it will be a while before those effects kick in at the earliest. All of this argues for a continuation of the troubled period in which we have found ourselves for months now, with little relief in sight. That suggests that lower to largely stable mortgage rates are likely to persist, with occasional flares higher as bright spots appear (such as the agreement to lend money to Greek banks and forestalling defaults seen this week). It's hard to fully know what the Fed has up its sleeve or how investors will ultimately react, and that may come in to play as we go along.

This week, the focus will be on the Fed and the few housing-related indicators which are due. An improved stock market firmed up interest rates as the week came to an end, and that suggests that we'll see mortgage rates firm up a little bit next week, probably just enough to lift us off record lows. Of course, a wildcard in the forecast is the Fed; if something unexpected comes in the statement which will come on Wednesday, some additional volatility in either direction might occur.

Take heed......
When you drink Vodka over ice, it can give you kidney failure.
When you drink Rum over ice, it can give you liver failure.
When you drink Whiskey over ice, it can give you heart problems.
When you drink Gin over ice, it can give you brain problems.
Apparently, ice is really bad for you!


Posted by Marc (Moshe) Preger on September 18th, 2011 9:08 AMPost a Comment (0)

Recent Posts:

Archive:

My Favorite Blogs:

Sites That Link to This Blog:

Marc (Moshe) Preger @ Chicago Bancorp 3606 Quentin Road Brooklyn, NY 11234
Phone: Cell:

Contact Us | About US | Mortgage Late Scores! | Home | Mortgage Calculators | Marc's Blog

Copyright © 2012 Marc (Moshe) Preger @ Chicago Bancorp
Portions Copyright © 2012 a la mode, inc.
Another XSite by a la mode, inc. | Admin LoginTerms of UseSite Map